nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 05, v.41 98-113
社会保险缴费负担对企业韧性的影响研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重大项目“金融业制度型开放助推构建新发展格局的路径研究”(23&ZD059)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20260515.001
发布时间: 2026-05-18
出版时间: 2026-05-18
网络发布时间: 2026-05-18
移动端阅读
摘要:

在多变性、不确定性、复杂性、模糊性不断凸显的背景下,打造企业韧性是实现经济高质量发展的前提和基础。基于2011—2022年中国A股非金融上市公司的数据测算企业韧性,并实证检验社会保险缴费负担下降时企业韧性的影响。研究结果表明,社会保险缴费负担下降有利于企业韧性的提升。以2019年国务院办公厅出台的《降低社会保险费率综合方案》为准自然实验进行政策效应分析,发现企业社会保险降费显著增强企业韧性。机制分析发现,减轻社会保险缴费负担主要通过削减劳动力成本、增加研发投入等促进企业韧性提升。异质性分析结果表明,对劳动密集型、非高科技、国有企业而言,社会保险降费对企业韧性的积极影响更为明显。从维度分析结果来看,社会保险缴费负担下降主要是通过恢复能力和成长能力两个维度提升企业韧性。因此,应持续落实阶段性社会保险缴费减负政策,加大对企业研发创新的支持力度,并进一步完善针对不同类型企业的差异化优惠政策设计。

Abstract:

In contexts characterized by mounting volatility,uncertainty,complexity,and ambiguity(VUCA),the development of firm resilience constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for achieving highquality economic growth.Adversities such as natural disasters,major public health emergencies,and economic recession may pose serious threats to the sustainable development of firms,making the importance of firm resilience increasingly prominent.Recent studies have identified the role of firm endowments and external operating environments in shaping firm resilience.Although the mechanisms differ,financial conditions and capital liquidity performance serve as key transmission variables.In terms of their impact on corporate finance and capital liquidity,the high social insurance contribution of Chinese firms directly constitute a component of operating costs.While extensive discussions have been conducted on how social insurance contribution expenditures affect firm investment,employment,innovation,and production efficiency,few studies have examined whether social insurance contribution expenditures and their adjustments influence firm resilience.Empirically,utilizing data from A-share listed non-financial firms in China spanning 2011 to 2022,firm resilience is measured,and the impact of social security contribution reduction is empirically examined.Moreover,the 2019 Comprehensive Program for Reducing Social Contribution Rates,issued by the General Office of the State Council,serves as a quasi-natural experiment for analyzing policy effects.Mediating effect are examined,and the interaction term is introduced to test the heterogeneity analysis.The empirical results reveal four key findings.First,the reduction of social security payment burden significantly improves firm resilience.The reduction directly cuts labor costs and expands the cash flow of firms,which not only reduces the risk of capital chain rupture when firms encounter risky impacts,but also affects their organism of production,investment decision-making,innovation inputs,and the relationship between supply and industrial chains,thus promoting the enhancement of firm resilience.Second,the decrease in the social security payment burden enhance firm resilience through two approaches:cutting labor costs and increasing innovation input.Third,reducing social security payment burden has a more significant effect on firm resilience in non-high-tech and state-owned firms.Forth,decreasing social security payment burden is mainly conducive to the enhancement of recovery resilience and growth ability of firms.Consequently,continued implementation of phased reductions in social insurance contribution burdens,increased support for enterprise R&D innovation,and refinement of differentiated preferential policies tailored to different firm types are recommended.Three contributions to the existing literature are made.First,constructing a new-era compliant firm resilience measurement index system.Current firm resilience measurement mainly relies on financial indicators(e.g.,business performance,employment,investment efficiency)or market indicators(e.g.,stock price,stock price volatility).This study incorporates supply chain-related indicators(e.g.,supplier dependence,customer dependence)and establishes an index system covering resilience's bearing,recovery,and growth capabilities.Second,expanding research on key antecedents of firm resilience by pioneering the test of social security payment burden's impact.Existing literature focuses on resilience cultivation through corporate resource endowments while neglecting the role of social security payment burden.Third,evaluating the policy effect of the 2019 Comprehensive Program for Reducing Social Security Payment Rates via a quasi-natural experiment.

参考文献

[1] 谢家智,何雯妤.现代产业链韧性评价及提升路径[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(2):15-28.

[2] HERNES T,BLAGOEV B,KUNISCH S,et al.From bouncing back to bouncing forward:a temporal trajectory model of organizational resilience[J].Academy of management review,2025,50(1):22.

[3] 胡海峰,宋肖肖,郭兴方.投资者保护制度与企业韧性:影响及其作用机制[J].经济管理,2020,42(11):23-39.

[4] WILLIAMS T A,GRUBER D A,SUTCLIFFE K M,et al.Organizational response to adversity:fusing crisis management and resilience research streams[J].Academy of management annals,2017,11(2):733-769.

[5] SAJKO M,BOONE C,BUYL T.CEO greed,corporate social responsibility,and organizational resilience to systemic shocks[J].Journal of management,2021,47(4):957-992.

[6] 李凯锋,张雅琴,陈淑芳.绿色技术创新背景下数智化转型与制造业企业的组织韧性[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(4):84-96.

[7] DESJARDINE M,BANSAL P,YANG Y.Bouncing back:building resilience through social and environmental practices in the context of the 2008 global financial crisis[J].Journal of management,2019,45(4):1434-1460.

[8] 李恩极,张晨,万相昱.经济政策不确定性下的创新决策:企业韧性视角[J].当代财经,2022(10):102-114.

[9] 陈勇兵,林雄立,李辉.社会保险缴费负担与企业机器人应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(9):49-70.

[10] 尹恒,张子尧,曹斯蔚.社会保险降费的就业促进效应——基于服务业的政策模拟[J].中国工业经济,2021(5):57-75.

[11] 李逸飞,李金,肖人瑞.社会保险缴费征管与企业人力资本结构升级[J].经济研究,2023,58(1):158-174.

[12] 李姝,田马飞.社会保险缴费率会影响企业创新产出吗?[J].统计研究,2022,39(11):59-72.

[13] 夏太彪,魏志华,曾爱民,等.社会保险缴费负担与企业转型升级[J].经济研究,2024,59(1):168-187.

[14] 赵健宇,陆正飞.养老保险缴费比例会影响企业生产效率吗?[J].经济研究,2018,53(10):97-112.

[15] 汪佩洁,蒙克,黄海,等.社会保险缴费率与企业全要素生产率和创新[J].经济研究,2022,57(10):69-85.

[16] 杜鹏程,徐舒,张冰.社会保险缴费基数改革的经济效应[J].经济研究,2021,56(6):142-158.

[17] TSIAPA M,BATSIOLAS I.Firm resilience in regions of Eastern Europe during the period 2007—2011[J].Post-communist economies,2019,31(1):19-35.

[18] MEYER A D.Adapting to environmental jolts[J].Administrative science quarterly,1982,27(4):515-537.

[19] WILDAVSKY A.Searching for safety[M].New Brunswick:Transaction Books,1988:16-28.

[20] ORTIZ-DE-MANDOJANA N,BANSALP.The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices[J].Strategic management journal,2016,37(8):1615-1631.

[21] 王楠楠,崔登峰.疾风知劲草:企业韧性评价指标体系与量化分析[J].工业技术经济,2023,42(2):86-95.

[22] 肖土盛,孙瑞琦,袁淳.新冠肺炎疫情冲击下企业现金持有的预防价值研究[J].经济管理,2020,42(4):175-191.

[23] 王钰,胡海青.冗余资源与创业导向:制度环境的调节效应[J].科研管理,2021,42(8):35-42.

[24] 史丹,李少林.新冠肺炎疫情冲击下企业生存韧性研究——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济管理,2022,44(1):5-26.

[25] FABBRI D,KLAPPER L F.Bargaining power and trade credit[J].Journal of corporate finance,2016,41(12):66-80.

[26] 贾勇,傅倩,汪琳,等.技术创新与企业韧性:基于新冠疫情情景[J].管理科学,2023,36(2):17-34.

[27] 封进.中国城镇职工社会保险制度的参与激励[J].经济研究,2013,48(7):104-117.

[28] 沈永建,范从来,陈冬华,等.显性契约、职工维权与劳动力成本上升:《劳动合同法》的作用[J].中国工业经济,2017(2):117-135.

[29] KRISHNAN K,NANDY D K,PURI M.Does financing spur small business productivity?Evidence from a natural experiment[J].The review of financial studies,2015,6(28):1768-1809.

[30] 鲁桐,党印.公司治理与技术创新:分行业比较[J].经济研究,2014,49(6):115-128.

(1)考虑到劳动密集型企业的经营活动更加依赖劳动力要素,其受到的政策冲击更大,因此可以作为社会保险降费事件的处理组。

(2)以固定资产占比(固定资产/总资产)和研发支出占比(研发支出/营业收入)为分类指标,对企业样本进行聚类分析,将固定资产占比较高的归为资产密集型,将研发支出占比较高的归为技术密集型,剩余的为劳动密集型。在为高科技企业赋值时,按照证监会2012年对中国上市公司的分类指引,将公司分类代码属于C25~C27、C37~C40、C42、D44、I63~I65、M73和N77的公司定义为高科技公司,其余为非高科技公司。另外,在进行企业所有权性质分组时,直接采用国泰安CSMAR数据库标注的股权类型进行划分。

基本信息:

DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20260515.001

中图分类号:F842.61;F279.2;D632.1

引用信息:

[1]张明,杜盼盼,范从来.社会保险缴费负担对企业韧性的影响研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2026,41(05):98-113.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20260515.001.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金重大项目“金融业制度型开放助推构建新发展格局的路径研究”(23&ZD059)

发布时间:

2026-05-18

出版时间:

2026-05-18

网络发布时间:

2026-05-18

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文