443 | 0 | 15 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
低收入群体家庭福利水平的提升是推进共同富裕的重要内容。对扶贫政策的福利水平效应进行了理论与实证分析,考虑到福利水平的逻辑递进关系,运用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据分别以人均劳动收入、多维贫困对福利水平进行测度。首先,利用双重差分模型(DID)分析发现,扶贫政策显著提升了贫困家庭的福利水平,降低了家庭多维贫困,提高了家庭人均劳动收入,并探讨了结果的稳健性。其次,基于需求层次理论和可行能力理论对家庭内生动力与自我发展能力进行了界定,并运用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据进行测算,进而就内生动力和自我发展能力与家庭福利水平的关系进行分析。分析发现,内生动力和自我发展能力对人均劳动收入和多维贫困的影响存在差异,自我发展能力对家庭福利水平的影响存在群体差异。最后,对内生动力与自我发展能力在扶贫政策影响低收入群体家庭福利水平方面的机制进行分析。分析发现,扶贫政策通过显著提高低收入群体家庭内生动力进而改善家庭福利水平;扶贫政策未能显著提高低收入家庭的自我发展能力。锚定低收入群体的帮扶政策,在降低政策参与门槛的同时,更应该关注低收入群体在政策中的参与程度;应进一步挖掘家庭发展的限制来自能力转化还是自我发展能力不足,以使帮扶政策产生持久性成效并助力乡村振兴。
Abstract:Enhancing the welfare levels of low-income groups in rural areas is not only crucial for consolidating poverty alleviation achievements, but also a top priority in promoting common prosperity.This research conducts a theoretical analysis of the impact of poverty alleviation policies on welfare levels.Given the logical progression in welfare improvement, welfare using per capita labor income and multi-dimensional poverty indices are measured, employing a difference-in-differences model to empirically analyze the policy effects.Targeted poverty alleviation and rural revitalization emphasize farmers' subjectivity, with stimulating endogenous motivation and improving self-development capabilities being key strategies to reduce policy dependence among low-income groups and narrow the gaps with other groups.The concepts of endogenous motivation and self-development capability are first defined based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory and Sen's capability approach, analyzing their relationship and mechanisms concerning family welfare levels.Then methods are developed to quantify these factors, using China Family Panel Studies(CFPS) data to compare differences across income groups and years, and further examine the impacts of endogenous motivation and self-development capability on the welfare levels of low-income families.Finally, empirically analyze how these factors mediate the effect of poverty alleviation policies on family welfare.The findings indicate: firstly, poverty alleviation policies have significantly improved the welfare levels of poor families by reducing multi-dimensional poverty and increasing per capita labor income.The robustness of these results is confirmed through common trends, heterogeneous treatment effects, and placebo tests.Secondly, endogenous motivation has a significant positive impact on the welfare levels of rural low-income families, effectively alleviating multi-dimensional poverty and boosting per capita labor income.However, the self-development capability of rural low-income families is significantly lower than that of non-low-income families.Finally, poverty alleviation policies enhance family welfare primarily by boosting endogenous motivation, while not significantly improves self-development capability, indicating that enhancing this capability should be a long-term focus during the transition from poverty alleviation to rural revitalization.Policymakers should explore the underlying reasons for weak self-development capability to better leverage for improving welfare levels, ensuring the sustainability of poverty alleviation efforts and supporting rural revitalization.
[1] 朱楠,王若莹.中国低收入群体社会救助制度的演进规律与路径优化[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(3):106-116.
[2] 李芳华,张阳阳,郑新业.精准扶贫政策效果评估——基于贫困人口微观追踪数据[J].经济研究,2020,55(8):171-187.
[3] 兰宇,张鹏.“脱贫不脱政策”何以防止脱贫农户返贫[J].中国农村经济,2024(5):167-184.
[4] 贾男,王赫.脱贫农户返贫风险防范政策研究[J].经济研究,2022,57(10):121-137.
[5] 李晗,陆迁.无条件现金转移支付与家庭发展韧性——来自中国低保政策的经验证据[J].中国农村经济,2022(10):82-101.
[6] 蒋庆正,李红.共同富裕目标下农户贴息贷款对低收入群体增收效应研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(7):102-116.
[7] 赵旭,池辰,赵菲菲.重大突发公共卫生事件冲击下农户的生计水平突变研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2022,37(1):65-77.
[8] DENG Q Q,LI E L,ZHANG P Y.Livelihood sustainability and dynamic mechanisms of rural households out of poverty:an empirical analysis of Hua County,Henan Province,China[J].Habitat international,2020,99:102160.
[9] 周迪,陈明成,邱铭坚.脱贫群体的内生动力与返贫风险——来自广东省相对贫困村的微观证据[J].财经研究,2022,48(8):48-62.
[10] 刘宇洋,丁士军,陈玉萍.家庭异质性视角下农户脆弱性影响因素研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(3):70-82.
[11] BALBONI C,BANDIERA O,BURGESS R,et al.Why do people stay poor?[J].The quarterly journal of economics,2022,137(2):785-844.
[12] 黄薇,曹杨.常态化精准扶贫政策的完善:反福利依赖的视角[J].经济研究,2022,57(4):172-190.
[13] 李为善,刘奔.主体性和哲学基本问题[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2002:4-19.
[14] 阿马蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].任颐,于真译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:189-190.
[15] 傅安国,张再生,郑剑虹,等.脱贫内生动力机制的质性探究[J].心理学报,2020,52(1):66-81.
[16] 刘欣.内生偏好与社会规范:脱贫内生动力的双重理论内涵[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(1):33-40.
[17] 郑瑞坤,向书坚.后扶贫时代中国农村相对贫困的一种测定方法与应用研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021(11):144-162.
[18] CHESNEY M A,NEILANDS T B,CHAMBERS D B,et al.A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale[J].British journal of health psychology,2006(3):421-437.
[19] WUEPPER D,TRAVIS J L.Perceived self-efficacy,poverty,and economic development[J].Annual review of resource economics,2017,9(1):383-404.
[20] ROSNOW R L,ESPOSITO J L,GIBNEY L.Factors influencing rumor spreading:replication and extension[J].Language & communication,1988,8(1):29-42.
[21] RIDLEY M,RAO G,Schilbach F,et al.Poverty,depression,and anxiety:causal evidence and mechanisms[J].Science,2020,370(6522):eaay0214.
[22] 何可,张俊飚,张露,等.人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿——以农业废弃物资源化为例[J].管理世界,2015(5):75-88.
[23] 周小刚,陈熹.关系强度、融资渠道与农户借贷福利效应——基于信任视角的实证研究[J].中国农村经济,2017(1):16-29.
[24] 张正岩,王志刚,孙文策,等.何以破解特困地区合作社的集体行动困境——基于社会资本视阈的多案例分析[J].农业经济问题,2022(11):77-96.
[25] HüNERMUND P,LOUW B ,RNKK M .The choice of control variables in empirical management research:how causal diagrams can inform the decision[J].The leadership quarterly,2025,36(2):101845.
[26] 管睿,余劲.生计恢复力、抱负水平与农户风险投资行为[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(4):69-78.
[27] 郎亮明,张彤,陆迁.农业科技扶贫的多维效应:增收、扶智与扶志——基于陕西省821份农户调研数据[J].农业技术经济,2021(9):129-144.
[28] 叶静怡,王琼.进城务工人员福利水平的一个评价——基于Sen的可行能力理论[J].经济学(季刊),2014(4):1323-1344.
[29] 沈费伟,胡紫依.乡村数字弱势群体能力贫困的内生原因与解决对策——基于森的“可行能力”理论探讨[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(2):112-123.
(1)“关于政协十三届全国委员会第二次会议第1551号提案答复的函”,国家乡村振兴局,2020年8月10日。
(2)内容整理自《农业农村部关于落实中共中央国务院关于学习运用“千村示范、万村整治”工程经验有力有效推进乡村全面振兴工作部署的实施意见》,农发[2024]1号、《国家乡村振兴局关于落实党中央国务院2023年全面推进乡村振兴重点工作部署的实施意见》,国乡振发[2023]1号。
(3)《关于加强低收入人口动态监测做好分层分类社会救助工作的意见》,民政部等,2023年10月19日。
(4)60周岁以上健康人群且能够从事简单劳动力的人员,通常被称为弱劳动力或半劳动力。以CFPS2014数据为例,筛选出只有一名家庭成员从事自家农业生产的农村家庭,此时家庭农业净收入可作为个人的农业净收入,结合个人的年龄进行分析,16至60周岁个人农业净收入的均值约为5 271元,60周岁以上个人农业净收入的均值约为2 855元,约为15至60周岁均值的54%,因此本文对超过60周岁仍然从事自家农业生产的成员赋值为0.5。
(5)数据来自国务院扶贫开发领导小组办公室官方网站。
基本信息:
DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20250430.006
中图分类号:F323.8
引用信息:
[1]严明义,马文杰.扶贫政策的福利水平效应[J].统计与信息论坛,2025,40(05):89-103.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20250430.006.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重点项目“内生动力和自我发展能力视角的精准扶贫措施动能测度与返贫防范对策研究”(19AJL007)