10,491 | 16 | 35 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
“双碳”目标视域下,新质生产力的提出对于平衡减排和经济发展至关重要。考虑企业是发展新质生产力的实践主体,深入考察企业的环境、社会和治理(ESG)表现对企业新质生产力的影响对于实现高质量和可持续发展具有重要意义。利用2009—2022年中国A股制造业企业的数据检验了ESG表现对企业新质生产力的影响效应和作用机制。实证结果表明:良好的ESG表现能够显著提升企业新质生产力,经过内生性处理和稳健性检验后,上述结论仍然成立。作用机制分析表明:良好的ESG表现通过促进企业颠覆性技术创新和提升企业劳动投资效率两条路径影响企业新质生产力,绿色金融能够正向调节企业ESG表现对新质生产力的影响效应。异质性分析表明:对于国有企业、大型企业和东部地区企业,企业ESG表现对新质生产力的提升作用更加显著。此外,碳减排绩效回归结果表明,ESG表现赋能企业新质生产力水平提升能够显著降低企业碳排放强度。研究结果不仅为企业提升ESG表现赋能新质生产力涌现提供了经验证据,而且揭示了企业ESG表现在有效减缓气候变化和降低碳排放风险方面的潜力,助力“双碳”目标实现。
Abstract:Under the perspective of the “dual-carbon” goal, the proposal of new quality productive forces is crucial for balancing emission reduction and economic development.Considering that firms are the main players in the development of new quality productive forces, it is important to study whether the ESG performance of firms can enhance their new quality productive forces.The relationship between ESG performance and firms' new quality productive forces is examined using data from Chinese A-share manufacturing firms from 2009 to 2022,and the empirical results show that good ESG performance can significantly enhance firms' new quality productive forces, and the above conclusions are still valid after endogeneity treatment and robustness test.The mechanism analysis shows that good ESG performance affects the new quality productive forces of enterprises through two paths: promoting the disruptive technological innovation of enterprises and improving the efficiency of enterprise labor investment, and green finance can positively regulate the impact of enterprise ESG performance on the new quality productive forces.Heterogeneity analysis shows that for state-owned enterprises, large enterprises and enterprises in the eastern region, the effect of corporate ESG performance on new quality productive forces is more significant.The regression results of carbon emission reduction performance show that ESG performance can significantly reduce the carbon emission intensity of enterprises by empowering them to improve the level of new quality productive forces.The findings not only provide empirical evidence for the emergence of new quality productive forces empowered by enterprises' ESG performance, but also reveal the potential of enterprises' ESG performance in effectively mitigating climate change and reducing the risk of carbon emissions, which can help realize the “dual-carbon” goal.
[1] 刘伟.科学认识与切实发展新质生产力[J].经济研究,2024,59(3):4-11.
[2] 蔡贵龙,张亚楠.基金ESG投资承诺效应——来自公募基金签署PRI的准自然实验[J].经济研究,2023,58(12):22-40.
[3] 孙娜,曲卫华.企业社会责任、碳减排与低碳经济增长——基于多部门DSGE模型的数值分析[J].金融与经济,2024(4):1-14.
[4] 李井林,阳镇,陈劲.ESG表现如何赋能企业绿色技术创新?——来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J].管理工程学报,2024,38(5):1-17.
[5] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13.
[6] 蒋永穆,乔张媛.新质生产力:逻辑、内涵及路径[J].社会科学研究,2024(1):10-18.
[7] 徐政,郑霖豪,丁守海.新质生产力促进共同富裕的内在机理与策略选择[J].改革,2024(4):41-49.
[8] 王珏,王荣基.新质生产力:指标构建与时空演进[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(1):31-47.
[9] 韩文龙,张瑞生,赵峰.新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(6):5-25.
[10] AVRAMOV D,CHENG S,LIOUI A,et al.Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty[J].Journal of financial economics,2022,145(2):642-664.
[11] 白雄,朱一凡,韩锦绵.ESG表现、机构投资者偏好与企业价值[J].统计与信息论坛,2022,37(10):117-128.
[12] 肖红军,沈洪涛,周艳坤.客户企业数字化、供应商企业ESG表现与供应链可持续发展[J].经济研究,2024,59(3):54-73.
[13] QU W,SUN N.Does CSR improve the quality of economic growth?Based on the perspective of green innovation[J].Sustainability,2024,16(15):6617.
[14] 徐凤敏,刘文玲,李雪鹏,等.“双碳”目标下绿色双层投资组合研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(1):55-70.
[15] 符加林,黄晓红.企业ESG表现如何影响企业全要素生产率?[J].经济经纬,2023,40(3):108-117.
[16] 李甜甜,李金甜.绿色治理如何赋能高质量发展:基于ESG履责和全要素生产率关系的解释[J].会计研究,2023(6):78-98.
[17] 韩忠雪,张莹.数字化转型与ESG表现——基于信息透明度及全要素生产率的中介机制分析[J].现代管理科学,2023(3):141-150.
[18] 赵国庆,李俊廷.企业数字化转型是否赋能企业新质生产力发展——基于中国上市企业的微观证据[J].产业经济评论,2024(4):23-34.
[19] 盛明泉,李志杰,汪顺.ESG信息披露与企业全要素生产率[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(8):88-100.
[20] 黄恒,齐保垒.企业信息披露的绿色创新效应研究——基于环境、社会和治理的视角[J].产业经济研究,2024(1):71-84.
[21] PARK S R,JANG J Y.The impact of ESG management on investment decision:institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria[J].International journal of financial studies,2021,9(3):48-57.
[22] MILLAR C,LOCKETT M,LADD T.Disruption:technology,innovation and society[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2018,129(4):254-260.
[23] 李钺霆,高煜,何苗.数字经济有利于提升“专精特新”中小企业培育成效吗?[J].软科学,2024,38(4):15-21.
[24] COCCIA M.Sources of technological innovation:radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms[J].Technology analysis & strategic management,2017,29(9):1048-1061.
[25] 张泽南,夏玉洁,张雪梅.赋能还是负能:ESG表现与企业劳动投资效率[J].外国经济与管理,2024,46(7):69-85.
[26] GHALY M,DANG V A,STATHOPOULOS K.Institutional investors’ horizons and corporate employment decisions[J].Journal of corporate finance,2020,64:101634.
[27] ACEMOGLU D,RESTREPO P.The race between man and machine:implications of technology for growth,factor shares,and employment[J].American economic review,2018,108(6):1488-1542.
[28] 王芳.企业ESG表现与低碳绿色转型——基于金融政策工具支持的效应评估[J].当代财经,2024(1):152-164.
[29] 王琳璘,廉永辉,董捷.ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J].证券市场导报,2022(5):23-34.
[30] KIM S,YOON A.Analyzing active fund managers’ commitment to ESG:evidence from the United Nations principles for responsible investment[J].Management science,2023,69(2):741-758.
[31] PáSTOR L’,STAMBAUGH R F,TAYLOR L A.Dissecting green returns[J].Journal of financial economics,2022,146(2):403-424.
[32] WANG Z,CHU E,HAO Y.Towards sustainable development:how does ESG performance promotes corporate green transformation[J].International review of financial analysis,2024(91):102982.
[33] 黄先海,高亚兴.数实产业技术融合与企业全要素生产率——基于中国企业专利信息的研究[J].中国工业经济,2023(11):118-136.
[34] 周雄勇,许志端.数字追溯可以促进供应链整合吗?——企业间信任和政府支持的双重调节作用[J].管理评论,2023,35(12):282-294.
[35] 柴正猛,邓雨田,韩先锋.绿色金融增强制造业韧性的机理及效应研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2024,30(2):114-130.
[36] 齐岳,谢晨瑶,黄佳宁.中国地区碳金融发展水平测度及影响因素研究[J].中国软科学,2024(S1):141-154.
[37] 肖有智,张晓兰,刘欣.新质生产力与企业内部薪酬差距——基于共享发展视角[J].经济评论,2024(3):75-91.
[38] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120.
[39] 丁声怿,白俊红.企业ESG表现与绿色全要素生产率[J].产业经济评论,2024(3):135-154.
[40] 刘鑫鑫,韩先锋.人工智能与制造业韧性:内在机制与实证检验[J].经济管理,2023,45(11):48-67.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.2024.0004
中图分类号:F832.51;F425;F273.1;X322
引用信息:
[1]孙娜,曲卫华.“双碳”目标下ESG表现赋能企业新质生产力[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(10):24-41.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.2024.0004.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上资助项目“双碳目标视域下企业社会责任对碳排放的作用机理、实现路径与行为演化研究”(72274115);国家自然科学基金面上资助项目“公众参与环境行为下雾霾治理与公共健康影响的根源、机理及演化研究”(71874103); 山西省哲学社会科学规划课题“新发展格局下山西省营商环境优化助推民营经济高质量发展研究”(2023YY032); 山西省博士研究生科研创新项目“新发展理念下碳达峰碳中和与经济社会协同发展内在机理研究”(2023KY043)