| 2,315 | 34 | 33 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
经济高质量发展已经成为当前与未来中国经济发展的战略方向,粤港澳大湾区经济高质量发展是新时代背景下的根本要求。根据"创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享"的新发展理念以及党的十九届五中全会提出的统筹发展和安全,构建经济高质量发展评价体系,运用熵权-TOPSIS法实证测度粤港澳大湾区经济高质量发展水平。研究发现:粤港澳大湾区经济高质量发展综合水平呈现高度集聚性、波动性、非均衡性的时空演变特征,等级演化呈现明星型城市高度波动、平庸型城市高度集聚、落后型城市"形单影只"的动态特征,创新驱动、协调发展、绿色生态、开放稳定、共享和谐、安全发展子系统的高质量发展水平呈现集聚性、复杂性、波动性、非均衡性的特征。在此基础上提出五大靶向路径,共建粤港澳大湾区经济高质量发展的命运共同体。
Abstract:The economic high-quality development has become the strategic direction of China's economic development now and future.The economic high-quality development is the fundamental requirement under the background of the new era in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.According to the spirit of the fifth plenary session of the 19 th central committee of the Communist Party of China, the new development concept of "innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing",an evaluation system of the economic high-quality development is built.The Entropy-TOPSIS method is used to empirically measure the economic development level of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.The results show that its comprehensive level of high-quality economic development presents the characteristics of highly agglomeration, volatility and non-equilibrium in time and space evolution.The dynamic features of level evolution is star city highly volatile, mediocre city highly concentrated, behind city "alone".The subsystems of innovation-driven development, coordinated development, green and ecology, openness and stability, sharing and harmony, safe and development of high-quality economic development level presents integration, complexity, volatility, unbalance characteristics.On the basis, the five target path is put forward to build a community of shared future in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.
[1] Somé J,Pasali S,Kaboine M.Exploring the Impact of Healthcare on Economic Growth in Africa[J].Applied Economics and Finance,2019,6(3):45-57.
[2] Nwala K.The Determinants of Economic Growth:An Empirical Investigation of North Carolina[J].International Journal of Economics & Financial Issues,2018(8):34-47.
[3] Thomas N.ICT and Economic Growth — Comparing Developing,Emerging and Developed Countries[J].World Development,2018,104(5):197-211.
[4] 孙久文.从高速度经济增长到高质量、平衡的区域发展[J].区域经济评论,2018(1):1-4.
[5] 任保平,朱晓萌.新时代中国高质量开放的测度及其路径研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(9):26-33.
[6] 陈诗一,陈登科.雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J].经济研究,2018,5(2):20-34.
[7] 金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):5-18.
[8] 刘淑春.中国数字经济高质量发展靶向路径与政策供给[J].经济学家,2019(6):52-61.
[9] 孙畅,黄梓轩.产业匹配视域下中国经济高质量发展的动力来源——基于门槛效应的实证研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(4):52-60.
[10] 魏敏,李书昊.新时代中国经济高质量发展水平的测度研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(11):3-20.
[11] 阳国亮,欧阳慧,程皓.区域合作空间维度的最优圈层研究——兼论粤港澳大湾区分工体系的纵深拓展[J].经济问题探索,2018(5):80-89.
基本信息:
中图分类号:F127;F224
引用信息:
[1]凌连新,阳国亮.粤港澳大湾区经济高质量发展的评价与靶向路径研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2021,36(06):120-128.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目“数字乡村建设与城乡要素流动的协同机理和实现路径研究”(20CJY038); 广西高校人文社会科学重点研究基地“北部湾海洋发展研究中心”项目
2020-09-10
2020
2020-12-06
2021-11-04
2021
2
2021-06-02
2021-06-02
2021-06-02