| 1,329 | 0 | 3085 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
数字经济时代,数据作为新型关键生产要素,其潜在价值释放已成为驱动经济高质量发展的重要引擎。基于2010—2022年中国各城市工商企业注册的微观数据,将各城市政府数据开放平台的陆续开通视为一项准自然实验,构建多时点双重差分模型进行因果识别。实证结果表明,政府公共数据开放对地区创业活跃度产生了显著且稳健的促进作用,数据开放平台的开通使地区新增企业数量的增长率提升了约8个百分点。这一结论在经过平行趋势检验、安慰剂检验以及多项稳健性检验后依然成立。机制分析揭示,政府公共数据开放的赋能效应主要通过降低制度性交易成本以及优化区域商业信用环境得以实现。异质性分析表明,政府公共数据开放的创业促进效应在创业者不确定性感知较低、人口规模较大以及地理区位优势明显的地区更为突出。基于研究结果,应从健全数据开放制度、强化平台安全建设及完善创业支持政策等多方面协同发力,全面激发数据要素价值,以数字化转型驱动区域创业活力提升。
Abstract:In the era of the digital economy, data as a new type of key factor of production, has seen the release of its potential value as a crucial engine driving high-quality economic development.Using a comprehensive dataset of micro-level industrial and commercial enterprise registrations across Chinese cities from 2010 to 2022,we treat the staggered launch of municipal government data open platforms as a quasi-natural experiment.We construct a staggered difference-in-differences(DID) model to identify the causal effect, meticulously addressing the challenges posed by variation in treatment timing.Empirical results demonstrate a significant and robust promoting effect of public data opening on regional entrepreneurial dynamism.On average, the inauguration of a city-level data open platform leads to an approximately 10-percentage-point increase in the growth rate of newly registered enterprises within a city.This core finding is not merely correlational but is established as causal through a series of rigorous tests.It withstands scrutiny from parallel trends tests, which confirm that treatment and control cities followed similar pre-treatment trajectories in entrepreneurial activity.Further mechanism analysis reveals that the “empowerment” effect of public data opening is primarily transmitted through two distinct yet potentially interconnected channels.The first channel is the reduction of institutional transaction costs.By providing centralized, often free, access to authoritative government-held data-such as information on market regulations, administrative procedures, licensing requirements, industry standards, zoning laws, and government procurement tenders-data open platforms significantly lower the costs for entrepreneurs associated with information search, compliance verification, and navigating bureaucratic complexities.The second channel involves the optimization of the regional business credit environment.The availability of public data, particularly that related to corporate registration, legal records, tax compliance, and other credibility-related information(where permissible),helps mitigate information asymmetry between market participants.Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the entrepreneurship-promoting effect of public data opening is not uniform across all regions.The effect is markedly more pronounced in regions characterized by:(1) lower perceived uncertainty among entrepreneurs(proxied, for instance, by lower regional economic volatility or a more stable policy environment),suggesting that data's value is amplified in contexts where foundational uncertainties are already managed;(2) larger population sizes, indicating that the benefits of data scale with market potential, demand agglomeration, and a thicker labor market;(3) geographically advantageous locations(e.g.,coastal cities, major transportation hubs),which likely possess better complementary infrastructure, higher connectivity, and greater absorptive capacity to leverage the opened data.Its efficacy is contingent upon and magnified by the interplay with regional endowment conditions, including human capital, market potential, and physical infrastructure.Data alone is insufficient; it requires fertile ground to yield maximum impact.Based on these results, this paper suggests that efforts should be made in a coordinate manner across multiple dimensions, such as improving the data opening system, strengthening platform security construction, and advancing entrepreneurship supporting policies, to fully stimulate the value of data elements and drive the enhancement of regional entrepreneurial vitality through digital transformation.
[1] NAGARAJ A.The private impact of public data:landsat satellite maps increased gold discoveries and encouraged entry[J].Management science,2022,68(1):564-582.
[2] ERTZ M,BOILY é.The rise of the digital economy:thoughts on blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies for the collaborative economy[J].International journal of innovation studeis,2019,3(4):84-93.
[3] CHEN H.The impact of intellectual property protection on the development of digital economy and regional entrepreneurial activity:evidence from small and medium enterprises[J].Frontiers in psychology,2022,13(1):951696.
[4] 陈晓红,李杨扬,宋丽洁,等.数字经济理论体系与研究展望[J].管理世界,2022,38(2):208-224.
[5] 方锦程,刘颖,高昊宇,等.公共数据开放能否促进区域协调发展?——来自政府数据平台上线的准自然实验[J].管理世界,2023,39(9):124-142.
[6] 尹志超,公雪,潘北啸.移动支付对家庭货币需求的影响——来自中国家庭金融调查的微观证据[J].金融研究,2019(10):40-58.
[7] 谢绚丽,沈艳,张皓星,等.数字金融能促进创业吗?——来自中国的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2018,17(4):1557-1580.
[8] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(10):65-76.
[9] 毕青苗,陈希路,徐现祥,等.行政审批改革与企业进入[J].经济研究,2018,53(2):140-155.
[10] 刘达,王晓丹,石玉堂,等.公共数据开放的稳就业效应——来自政府数据平台开通的经验证据[J].软科学,2024(9):1-16.
[11] 彭远怀.政府数据开放的价值创造作用:企业全要素生产率视角[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(9):50-70.
[12] 申渊源,朱宏博,乔志林.数字经济、数字化转型与企业核心竞争力[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(2):72-84.
[13] 蔡栋梁,邱黎源,孟晓雨,等.流动性约束、社会资本与家庭创业选择——基于CHFS数据的实证研究[J].管理世界,2018,34(9):79-94.
[14] ACEMOGLU D,RESTREPO P.Robots and jobs:evidence from US labor markets[J].Journal of political economy,2020,128(6):2188-2244.
[15] 田园,王铮.非正式制度因素对创业的影响作用探讨[J].中国软科学,2016(3):24-34.
[16] 陈艳利,蒋琪.数据生产要素视角下开放公共数据与企业创新——基于建立公共数据开放平台的准自然实验[J].经济管理,2024,46(1):25-46.
[17] 周广肃,樊纲.互联网使用与家庭创业选择——来自CFPS数据的验证[J].经济评论,2018(5):134-147.
[18] LAPORTA R,LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F,SHLEIFER A,et al.The quality of government[J].Journal of law,economics,and organization,1999,15(1):222-279.
[19] AVOM D,DADEGNON A K,IGUE C B.Does digitalization promote net job creation?Empirical evidence from WAEMU countries[J].Telecommunications policy,2021,45(8):102215.
[20] 王春超,冯大威.企业家创业行为研究新进展[J].经济学动态,2016(8):115-125.
[21] 张柳钦,李建生,孙伟增.制度创新、营商环境与城市创业活力——来自中国自由贸易试验区的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(10):93-114.
[22] KONG D,QIN N,XIANG J.Minimum wage and entrepreneurship:evidence from China[J].Journal of economic behavior & organization,2021(189):320-336.
[23] DAUGAREILH I.Introduction:social protection for digital platform workers in Europe[J].International social security review,2021(74):5-12.
[24] 陈海龙,李阳.数字经济发展对创业活跃度的空间溢出效应研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(5):41-52.
[25] 袁礼,龚钰涵.专利质押融资对创业活跃度的影响[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(11):202-224.
[26] 何雨可,牛耕,逯建,等.数字治理与城市创业活力——来自“信息惠民国家试点”政策的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(1):47-66.
[27] 黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济,2019(8):5-23.
[28] 夏杰长,刘诚.行政审批改革、交易费用与中国经济增长[J].管理世界,2017(4):47-59.
[29] 黄亮雄,孙湘湘,王贤彬.商事制度改革有效激发创业了吗?——来自地级市的证据[J].财经研究,2020,46(2):142-155.
[30] 田相辉,刘新民,徐小靓.数字经济与创业空间分布[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(12):100-111.
[31] 陈胜利,王东.数字化转型与企业韧性:效应与机制[J].西安财经大学学报,2023,36(4):65-77.
[32] 吴敏,曹婧,毛捷.地方公共债务与企业全要素生产率:效应与机制[J].经济研究,2022,57(1):107-121.
[33] 钱先航,曹春方.信用环境影响银行贷款组合吗——基于城市商业银行的实证研究[J].金融研究,2013(4):57-70.
[34] 于文超,梁平汉,高楠.公开能带来效率吗——政府信息公开影响企业投资效率的经验研究[J].经济学(季刊),2020,19(3):1041-1058.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.2025.0053
中图分类号:F49;F279.2;D63
引用信息:
[1]程茂勇,邓诣凡.政府公共数据开放对地区创业活跃度的影响效应[J].统计与信息论坛,2025,40(12):118-128.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.2025.0053.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“数字经济背景下银行数据资产价值实现研究”(21FJYB06)
2025-12-10
2025-12-10