nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2022, 12, v.37 20-31
生产性服务业集聚对绿色技术创新的影响研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目“异质性框架下的城市网络体系与空间资源配置:理论、机制和中国经验”(71603282)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2022-10-24
出版时间: 2022-10-24
网络发布时间: 2022-10-24
移动端阅读
摘要:

绿色技术创新已成为中国实现“双碳”目标的重要方案,如何促进绿色技术创新则成为当前城市实现经济绿色发展的迫切任务。已有相关研究大多着眼于生产性服务业集聚与技术创新之间的关系,但将绿色技术创新作为切入点的研究较少,关注生产性服务业集聚与绿色技术创新空间关联的研究则更为缺乏。为此,在阐述生产性服务业集聚对绿色技术创新的作用机制基础上,以中国2008—2019年266个城市为样本,采用空间杜宾模型实证检验生产性服务业集聚对绿色技术创新的空间效应及作用机制,并考察人力资本积累对二者关系的调节效应。研究发现:生产性服务业集聚能够显著促进城市绿色技术创新,经过一系列稳健性检验后,该结论依然成立。作用机制分析结果显示,生产性服务业多样化集聚有助于改善本地及邻地绿色技术创新,而专业化集聚仅促进了本地绿色技术创新。与此同时,城市人力资本积累水平越高,越有利于提升生产性服务业集聚的绿色技术创新效应。异质性分析发现,人力资本积累与生产性服务业集聚对绿色技术创新的综合效应在特大型及以上城市和高端生产性服务业的表现更明显。最后,基于理论和实证的研究结论提出应重视生产性服务业集聚的质量、不断强化人力资本积累、加快区域绿色技术创新收敛的政策建议。研究结论为推动绿色技术创新发展提供了新思路,也为推动城市经济绿色转型提供了经验借鉴和政策启示。

Abstract:

Green technology innovation has become an important plan for China to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals, and how to promote green technology innovation has become an urgent task for the green development of urban economy at present.Most of the existing studies focus on the relationship between producer services agglomeration and technological innovation, but few studies take green technological innovation as a starting point, and even fewer studies focus on the spatial correlation between producer services agglomeration and green technological innovation.On that account, 266 cities in China from 2008 to 2019 are selected as samples and the spatial Durbin model is used to empirically study the spatial effects of producer services agglomeration on green technology innovation.The research results are shown as follow:(1) It is found that producer services agglomeration can significantly facilitate urban green technology innovation, and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests.(2) Analysis of the mechanism proves that diversified agglomeration of producer services helps to improve local and neighboring green technology innovation, while specialized agglomeration of producer services only promotes local green technology innovation.At the same time, human capital accumulation can effectively improve the green technology innovation effect of producer services agglomeration.(3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the comprehensive effect of human capital accumulation and producer services agglomeration on green technology innovation is more obvious in mega-cities and high-end producer services.Based on the above research conclusions, in order to accelerate the agglomeration of producer services and promote urban green technology innovation, the following policy recommendations are put forward:(1) Urban development should focus on the agglomeration quality of producer services and enhance the supporting role of industrial agglomeration in green economic development.On the one hand, urban development needs to attach importance to the strong driving effect of diversified cluster of producer services.On the other hand, cities should improve the quality of specialized agglomeration of producer services.(2) Urban development should enhance the agglomeration effect of producer services by strengthening human capital accumulation.Local governments should build an efficient and smooth human capital market, build and improve an open platform for the service industry, guide all kinds of talents to integrate into producer services, create favorable conditions for the development and expansion of producer services, enhance the agglomeration effect of producer services, and promote green technological innovation.(3) Coordinated development of producer services agglomeration and the convergence of regional green technology innovation should be taken seriously.For megacities, the agglomeration quality of producer services should be improved and the economic radiation effect on other cities should be strengthened.In addition, other types of cities should enhance technology absorption capacity to provide technological accumulation for the realization of green technology innovation.The research of this paper provides new ideas for promoting the innovation and development of green technology, and also provides experience and policy enlightenment for promoting the green transformation of urban economy.

参考文献

[1] 徐佳,崔静波.低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2020(12):178-196.

[2] RENNINGS K,ZIEGLER A,ANKELE K,et al.The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance[J].Ecological economics,2006,57(1):45-59.

[3] SUN Y,LU Y,WANG T,et al.Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2008,75(7):1032-1042.

[4] 原毅军,郭然.生产性服务业集聚、制造业集聚与技术创新——基于省级面板数据的实证研究[J].经济学家,2018(5):23-31.

[5] 徐建中,王曼曼.制造业集聚、技术进步与绿色创新绩效——对我国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(12):54-61.

[6] 蒋伏心,王竹君,白俊红.环境规制对技术创新影响的双重效应——基于江苏制造业动态面板数据的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2013(7):44-55.

[7] 周海华,王双龙.正式与非正式的环境规制对企业绿色创新的影响机制研究[J].软科学,2016,30(8):47-51.

[8] XIE H,CHEN Q,LU F,et al.Spatial-temporal disparities and influencing factors of total-factor green use efficiency of industrial land in China[J].Journal of cleaner production,2019,207:1047-1058.

[9] 杜传忠,杜新建,晁世娟.我国生产性服务业促进技术创新的机制及效应分析[J].经济与管理,2017,31(6):39-44.

[10] 韩峰,阳立高.生产性服务业集聚如何影响制造业结构升级?——一个集聚经济与熊彼特内生增长理论的综合框架[J].管理世界,2020,36(2):72-94.

[11] 胡绪华,陈默,罗雨森,等.制造业与生产性服务业耦合协调、空间共聚与绿色创新效应研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2021,36(7):97-112.

[12] 罗超平,朱培伟,张璨璨,等.生产性服务业集聚促进了城市绿色创新吗——基于“本地—邻地”效应的视角[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2022,48(1):97-112.

[13] 杨明海,刘凯晴,谢送爽.教育人力资本、健康人力资本与绿色技术创新——环境规制的调节作用[J].经济与管理评论,2021,37(2):138-149.

[14] 张辉,石琳.人力资本与区域创新研究——基于空间面板模型的分析[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2018,32(5):49-57.

[15] 赵息,马杰.环境规制与绿色创新的关系研究——基于金融发展与人力资本调节效应的实证分析[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2018,38(2):63-72.

[16] 余奕杉,卫平,高兴民.生产性服务业集聚对城市绿色全要素生产率的影响——以中国283个城市为例[J].当代经济管理,2021,43(4):54-65.

[17] 王许亮,王恕立.中国服务业集聚的绿色生产率效应[J].山西财经大学学报,2021,43(3):43-55.

[18] 韩峰,严伟涛,王业强.生产性服务业集聚与城市环境质量升级——基于土地市场调节效应的研究[J].统计研究,2021,38(5):42-54.

[19] 刘军,曹雅茹,吴昊天.产业协同集聚对区域绿色创新的影响[J].中国科技论坛,2020(4):42-50.

[20] 任阳军,何彦,杨丽波,等.生产性服务业集聚、制造业集聚对绿色创新效率的影响——基于中国城市面板数据的空间计量分析[J].系统工程,2020,38(3):27-35.

[21] 何永达.人力资本、知识创新与服务业空间集聚——基于省际面板数据的计量分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(9):120-125.

[22] 马明.我国相邻区域人力资本与区域创新能力的非线性关系研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2016(10):119-123.

[23] 徐晓红,汪侠.生产性服务业集聚、空间溢出与绿色全要素生产率提升[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(5):16-25.

[24] SCHIEDERIG T,TIETZE F,HERSTATT C.Green innovation in technology and innovation management:an exploratory literature review[J].R&D management,2012,42(2):180-192.

[25] 刘奕,夏杰长,李垚.生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级[J].中国工业经济,2017(7):24-42.

(1)借鉴韩峰等(2021)的划分做法,本文定义高端生产性服务业包括信息传输、计算机服务和软件业,金融业,科学研究、技术服务和地质勘探业;一般生产性服务业包括交通运输、仓储和邮政业,租赁和商务服务业。

(2)此处依据2014年国务院印发的《通知》内容,由于本文样本中人口规模小于100万的城市占比低,为了避免因样本量过小导致的伪回归问题,特将Ⅰ型小城市、Ⅱ型小城市以及中等城市归集为中小城市类型;将城区常住人口100万以上500万以下的城市归为大城市类型;城区常住人口500万以上的特大及超大城市被划定为超大及以上城市类型。大城市和超大及以上城市类型依然按照《通知》标准进行划分。

基本信息:

中图分类号:F719;F124.5;F124.3

引用信息:

[1]黄漫宇,余祖鹏,赵曜.生产性服务业集聚对绿色技术创新的影响研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2022,37(12):20-31.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目“异质性框架下的城市网络体系与空间资源配置:理论、机制和中国经验”(71603282)

发布时间:

2022-10-24

出版时间:

2022-10-24

网络发布时间:

2022-10-24

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文